Whether Petitioner is entitled to an Extraordinary Writ of Mandamus to litigate his FEDERAL Court cases against the State of California

QUESTIONS PRESENTED This petition seeks restoration of Petitioner’ right to a fair trial by impartial tribunal; and relief from USCA9 judicial discriminatory misconduct to deprive a_ self represented litigant of access to litigate, including imposition of cruel and unusual punishment without due process of law. (1) Whether Petitioner is entitled to an Extraordinary Writ of Mandamus to litigate his FEDERAL Court cases against the State of California!? (2) Whether Petitioner is entitled to an Extraordinary Writ of Mandamus to USCA9 to enforce with strict scrutiny, compliance with 28 USC §§ 455, in order to protect Petitioner' Constitutional right of fair trial before an impartial tribunal? . (3) Whether Petitioner is entitled to an Extraordinary Writ of mandamus to USCAQ to vacate 2054, 21-56306, 21-56303 and remand 2:19-cv-01458 and 2:21-cv-0730 to trials before new judicial officers at the US District Court of the Central District of California. (4) Whether Petitioner is entitled to an Extraordinary Writ of mandamus to prohibit the use of Rules of Courts or Federal Rules of Civil Procedures ("FCRP"), without substantive due process of law, to deprive litigants from their constitutional rights to: free speech, right to counsel, due process and fair and speedy trial before an impartial tribunal. 1 As noted by Justice Fletcher dissenting opinion, "/w/hen faced with the corruption of our legal system, we must start over’. Pizzuto v Blades, 673 F 3d 1008. 103,1023 (9TH Cir. 2012) 1