Did the R.I. Judiciary violate multiple constitutional rights through retaliatory actions, improper evidence handling, and procedural misconduct?

Did the R.I. Judiciary violate Petitioner’s First Amendment right by retaliating (repeatedly) (e.g. arbitrarily doubling Petitioner's bail, denying Petitioner’s Motions (including for exculpatory evidence), having Petitioner arrested when no offense was committed, stripping Petitioner of his legal presumption, stripping Petitioner of his law license, etc.) against Petitioner's exercise of Constitutionally Protected Free Speech (speech consisting of exposing evidence of federal felony crimes, etc. committed by the State, etc., pointing out examples (supported by prima facie evidence) of corruption, etc. by members of the R.I. Judiciary (including by justices of the R.I. Supreme Court (the entity who sua sponte stripped Petitioner of his law license)) (as ADMITTED by all five justices of the R.I. Supreme Court), etc.)? Did the R.I. Judiciary violate Petitioner’s Fourth Amendment right against seizure of property when R.I. Judiciary courthouse security confiscated (without a warrant) Petitioner's cell phone (on more than one occasion), the R.I. Supreme Court, without basis, stripped Petitioner of his law license (effectively seized Petitioner’s property right)? Did the R.I. Judiciary violate Petitioner's Fourth Amendment right against searches when R.I. Judiciary courthouse security searched (without a warrant) the contents of Petitioner’s cell phone, the Page i of xxvi R.I. Supreme Court, without basis, ordered Petitioner be investigated, etc.? Note, to date (HALF A YEAR after the R.I. Supreme Court, without basis, ordered Petitioner be investigated), the : investigations, etc. continue despite people like the R.I. Supreme Court justices, etc. having not only been informed through the process (including being cc’ed on things like Petitioner’s “Eighth Emergency Letter to Associate Justice Rekas Sloan (P2-20233243A)” (Dated August 21, 2024), etc.) but having received Petitioner’s SCOTUS Petition for Writ of Certiorari (Dated November 25, 2024) (Case #24-614) (which included things like this SCOTUS Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, Petitioner’s “Memorandum in Opposition to Appellee’s Motion to Dismiss (SU2024-0235-CA),” Petitioner's “Fifth Emergency Letter to Associate Justice Rekas Sloan (P2-2023-3243A)” (Dated May 31, 2024), Petitioner’s “Sixth Emergency Letter to Associate Justice Rekas Sloan (P2-20233243A)” (Dated June 20, 2024), Petitioner’s “Seventh Emergency Letter to Associate Justice Rekas Sloan (P2-2023-3243A)” (Dated July 2, 2024), etc.). Note, Respondent chose not to file a response to Petitioner’s SCOTUS Petition for Writ of Certiorari (Dated November 25, 2024) (Case #24-614) and | instead filed a waiver. Did the R.I. Judiciary violate Petitioner’s Fifth Amendment right when the R.I. Judiciary had (and on another occasion (even after Petitioner pointed out to the judge their previous Constitutional ~— Page ii of xxvi violation) attempted to have) Petitioner testify in his criminal case? Has the R.I. Judiciary violated Petitioner’s Fifth Amendment right by forcing Petitioner to answer for crime that the Prosecution has failed to present evidence exists (e.g. what Prosecution has submitted is prima facie forged (counterfeited) “evidence” (the entity from which the supposed evidence came has declared NO SUCH DOCUMENT EXISTS IN THEIR RECORDS (DESPITE THE DOCUMENT APPEARING TO ALLEGEDLY BE FROM THEM)))? Did the R.L. Judiciary violate Petitioner's Brady, Due Process, etc. rights when the R.I. Judiciary has not only, among other things, aided and abetted Prosecution’s concealment of exculpatory evidence, etc. but a judge has issued a signed order declaring that “case law” (without declaring what supposed “case law”) states that a defendant in a criminal case is NOT entitled to exculpatory evidence? Did the R.I. Judiciary violate Petitioner’s Sixth Amendment right to a speedy process when the RI. Judiciary has repeatedly intentionally kept Petitioner’s multiple Motions (e.g. Motions for Dismissal, Subpoenas, etc.), Appeals