No. 24-1002
Steven C. Fustolo v. The Patriot Group, LLC
Tags: automatic-stay bankruptcy-procedure bankruptcy-stay judicial-enforcement legal-remedy state-court-injunction
Key Terms:
JusticiabilityDoctri
JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2025-05-22
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Does an automatic stay in bankruptcy prevent a state from enforcing a pre-stay state court injunction against a bankruptcy petitioner during the period of the automatic stay?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
Does an automatic stay in bankruptcy prevent a state from enforcing a pre-stay state court injunction against a bankruptcy petitioner during the period of the automatic stay? When a state court has violated the automatic stay in bankruptcy, is such an act “void” or is it “voidable”? ii STATEMENT OF
Docket Entries
2025-05-27
Petition DENIED.
2025-05-06
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/22/2025.
2025-04-16
Brief of The Patriot Group, LLC in opposition submitted.
2025-04-16
Brief of respondent The Patriot Group, LLC in opposition filed.
2025-03-17
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due April 21, 2025)
2025-01-13
Application (24A672) granted by Justice Jackson extending the time to file until March 17, 2025.
2025-01-03
Application (24A672) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from January 14, 2025 to March 15, 2025, submitted to Justice Jackson.
Attorneys
Steven Fustolo
John Gilgun Mateus — Law Offices of John G. Mateus, Esq., Petitioner
John Gilgun Mateus — Law Offices of John G. Mateus, Esq., Petitioner
The Patriot Group, LLC
Jack Irving Siegal — Fox Rothschild LLP, Respondent
Jack Irving Siegal — Fox Rothschild LLP, Respondent