Whether the Petitioner is entitled to Default Judgment and whether the Eastern District Court abused its discretion in multiple procedural rulings

1. Whether the Petitioner, JUSTICIA RIZZO is entitled to Default Judgement. 2. Whether Eastern District Court Judge, David L. Bunning abused discretion when he stated the summons was incorrect. 3. Whether Eastern District Court, abused discretion when claiming the Petitioner could not serve the Defendant through the mail S she is a party to the civil action. 4. Whether the Eastern District Court was responsible to have the Defendant served by the US Marshalls. 5. Whether the Eastern District Court, abused discretion when denying the Petitioner ’s motion to enter the MSPB Final Order and The EEOC APPEAL Decision. 6. Whether the District Court ERRED when denying an extension pursuant to Federal Rules Civil Procedure FRCP (4) 7. Whether the District Court Judge abused discretion when he contemporaneously ruled in favor of the Defendant absent a response to the courts. 8. Whether the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals ERRED, when they failed to REMAND the case back to District Court, for remedy of service rather than upholding the dismissal. i