No. 24-1016
RiseandShine Corporation, dba Rise Brewing v. PepsiCo, Inc.
CVSGResponse RequestedRelisted (2)
Tags: circuit-split federal-trademark intellectual-property likelihood-of-confusion statutory-interpretation trademark-law
Key Terms:
AdministrativeLaw Trademark Patent JusticiabilityDoctri
AdministrativeLaw Trademark Patent JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2025-09-29
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether trademark strength is a question of fact in a likelihood-of-confusion analysis under 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
Courts in every circuit consider several factors in determin ing whether an alleged trademark infringer’s use “is likely to cause confusion” under 15 U.S.C. § 1114. Chief among th ose factors is the trademark’s strength , that is, its level of distinctiveness. Twelve circuits consider trademark strength an issue of fact. The Second Circuit stands alone in considering it a question of law. The question presented is: Whether trademark strength is a question of fact in a likelihood -of-confusion analysis under 15 U.S.C. § 1114 .
Docket Entries
2025-10-06
The Solicitor General is invited to file a brief in this case expressing the views of the United States.
2025-07-30
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/29/2025.
2025-07-25
Reply of RiseandShine Corporation, dba Rise Brewing submitted.
2025-07-25
Reply of petitioner RiseandShine Corporation, dba Rise Brewing filed.
2025-07-25
Reply of petitioner RiseandShine Corporation filed.
2025-07-14
Brief of PepsiCo, Inc. in opposition submitted.
2025-07-14
Brief of respondent PepsiCo, Inc. in opposition filed.
2025-05-16
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including July 14, 2025.
2025-05-15
Motion of PepsiCo, Inc. for an extension of time submitted.
2025-05-15
Motion to extend the time to file a response from June 12, 2025 to July 14, 2025, submitted to The Clerk.
2025-05-13
Response Requested. (Due June 12, 2025)
2025-05-06
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/22/2025.
2025-03-19
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due April 23, 2025)
Attorneys
PepsiCo, Inc.
Dale M. Cendali — Kirkland & Ellis LLP, Respondent
RiseandShine Corporation, dba Rise Brewing
Kirk Timothy Bradley — Alston & Bird LLP, Petitioner
Christopher Louis McArdle — Alston & Bird LLP, Petitioner
Paul Tanck — Alston & Bird LLP, Petitioner
Wade Geoffrey Perrin — Alston & Bird LLP, Petitioner