No. 24-1020

Uber Technologies, Inc., a Delaware Corporation, et al. v. Amie Drammeh, et al.

Lower Court: Ninth Circuit
Docketed: 2025-03-25
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Amici (1)Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (2) Experienced Counsel
Tags: circuit-split erie-doctrine federal-courts judicial-prediction procedural-law state-law
Key Terms:
Jurisdiction JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference: 2025-09-29 (distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether federal courts can predict changes in state law under Erie Railroad Co. v. Tompkins

Question Presented (from Petition)

Whether, under Erie Railroad Co. v. Tompkins , 304 U.S. 64 (1938), a federal court must apply existing state law, as the D.C., First, Fourth, and Fifth Circuits hold, or can predict c hanges in state law, as the Second, Third, Seventh, Eighth, Ninth, Tenth, and Eleventh Circuits hold.

Docket Entries

2025-10-06
Petition DENIED.
2025-07-02
Reply of petitioners Uber Technologies, Inc., et al. filed. (Distributed)
2025-07-02
Reply of Uber Technologies, Inc., et al. submitted.
2025-07-02
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/29/2025.
2025-06-13
2025-06-13
2025-06-13
Brief of respondents Amie Drammeh, et al in opposition filed.
2025-06-13
Brief of respondents Jane Doe in opposition filed.
2025-06-13
Brief of Jane Doe in opposition submitted.
2025-06-13
Brief of Amie Drammeh, et al in opposition submitted.
2025-05-14
2025-05-14
Amicus brief of Washington Legal Foundation submitted.
2025-04-25
The Motions to extend the time to file responses are granted and the time is extended to and including June 13, 2025, for all respondents.
2025-04-23
Motion of respondents Amie Drammeh, et al. to extend the time to file a response from May 14, 2025 to June 13, 2025, submitted to The Clerk.
2025-04-23
Motion or respondent Jane Doe to extend the time to file a response from May 14, 2025 to June 13, 2025, submitted to The Clerk.
2025-04-23
Motion of Amie Drammeh, et al for an extension of time submitted.
2025-04-23
Motion of respondent Jane Doe to extend the time to file a response from May 14, 2025 to June 13, 2025, submitted to The Clerk.
2025-04-23
Motion of Jane Doe for an extension of time submitted.
2025-04-14
Response Requested. (Due May 14, 2025)
2025-04-09
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/25/2025.
2025-04-03
Waiver of right of respondent Jane Doe to respond filed.
2025-04-03
Waiver of right of respondents Amie Drammeh, et al to respond filed.
2025-04-03
Waiver of Jane Doe of right to respond submitted.
2025-04-03
Waiver of Amie Drammeh, et al of right to respond submitted.
2025-03-21
2025-01-15
Application (24A690) granted by Justice Kagan extending the time to file until March 21, 2025.
2025-01-14
Response to application from respondent Amie Drammeh, Yusepha Ceesay, and Maram Ceesay filed.
2025-01-10
Application (24A690) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from January 22, 2025 to March 21, 2025, submitted to Justice Kagan.

Attorneys

Amie Drammeh, et al
Brent Marcus RosenthalLaw Office of Brent M. Rosenthal, PC, Respondent
Brent Marcus RosenthalLaw Office of Brent M. Rosenthal, PC, Respondent
Jane Doe
Tiffany Joana GatesLaw Offices of Tiffany J. Gates, Respondent
Tiffany Joana GatesLaw Offices of Tiffany J. Gates, Respondent
Uber Technologies, Inc., et al.
Theane Evangelis KapurGibson, Dunn and Crutcher LLP, Petitioner
Theane Evangelis KapurGibson, Dunn and Crutcher LLP, Petitioner
Washington Legal Foundation
Saad GulWashington Legal Foundation, Amicus
Cory L. Andrews — Amicus
Cory L. Andrews — Amicus