Whether the First Circuit erred in holding that City officials' decision not to act on Petitioners' completed sightseeing vehicle license applications constitutes a violation of Due Process and Equal Protection Clause rights

ARE: Whether the First Circuit erred in holding that City officials decision [not] to act on Petitioners completed sightseeing vehicle license applications, in absence of any form of due process, fails to suffice a "Due Process violation" and an "Equal Protection Clause violation" on the part of the Respondents, as deemed relevant to undisputed facts. Whether the First Circuit erred warranting summary reversal when the court failed to hold to the Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b)(4) and 56(a)(c) as deemed relevant to the Plaintiffs Statement of Material Facts of this case. Whether the U.S. District Court's analysis, pursuant to the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, is fundamentally flawed, whereby the Court fails to hold to the stated purpose of that enactment; Notice and Opportunity to be heard before an impartial tribunal must be administered prior to rendering a final decision or judgment of deprivation of a persons rights. Whether the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of MA and the First Circuit committed; REVERSIBLE ERROR when they failed to hold to "The Law of Void Judgments and Decisions" that a judgment may not be rendered in violation of U.S. Constitutional Protections due to lack of due process, in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b)(4) and the doctrine of procedural due process law, as deemed relevant to the undisputed material facts of this case. A VOID1. 2. not 3. 4. 11 JUDGMENT MAY BE CHALLENGED IN ANY COURT AT ANY TIME. THERE ARE NO TIME RESTRAINTS WHEN APPEALING A VOID JUDGMENT. i