No. 24-105
Boris Kotlyarsky v. Department of Justice, et al.
Response WaivedRelisted (2)
Tags: constitutional-rights conviction criminal-plea criminal-procedure due-process evidence habeas-corpus innocence judicial-review procedural-safeguards
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity DueProcess
SocialSecurity DueProcess
Latest Conference:
2024-11-22
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)
In the context of habeas corpus, would it constitute a breach of due process to convict a defendant in a criminal proceeding, despite clear evidence demonstrating that the accused never committed the crime?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. In the context of habeas corpus, would it constitute a breach of due process to convict a defendant in a criminal proceeding, despite clear evidence demonstrating that the accused never committed the crime? 2. Is a District Court Judge obligated to ensure due process by scrutinizing a plea in a criminal case and the underlying circumstances before accepting the plea? . i
Docket Entries
2024-11-25
Rehearing DENIED.
2024-11-06
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/22/2024.
2024-11-01
Petition for Rehearing filed.
2024-10-07
Petition DENIED.
2024-09-04
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/30/2024.
2024-08-30
Waiver of Department of Justice, et al. of right to respond submitted.
2024-08-30
Waiver of right of respondent Department of Justice, et al. to respond filed.
2024-03-31
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due August 30, 2024)
Attorneys
Department of Justice, et al.
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent