No. 24-108

John Paul Salvador v. United States

Lower Court: Ninth Circuit
Docketed: 2024-07-31
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Amici (6) Experienced Counsel
Tags: bankruptcy-code circuit-split discharge discharge-ability honest-and-reasonable-attempt income-tax-return late-filed-returns late-filing tax-debt tax-debts
Key Terms:
JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference: 2024-11-01
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether a late but otherwise correctly filed Form 1040 is a 'return' for purposes of §523(a) of the Bankruptcy Code

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION PRESENTED The Bankruptcy Code provides that an individual debtor’s unpaid tax debts are dischargeable so long as they meet certain requirements. For older tax debts, one of those requirements is that the debtor have filed a “return” for each of the tax years in which the debts were incurred. Because many tax returns are filed after the dates on which they are due, the question whether a latefiled Form 1040 income tax return is a “return” is an important one that affects numerous debtors seeking a fresh start under the Bankruptcy Code each year. Due to a three-way circuit split, whether a debtor’s late-filed Form 1040 is a “return” depends on where the debtor lives. Three circuits hold that, even if the IRS accepts it as a tax return, a Form 1040 is not a “return” if it has any filing defects—meaning it is not a “return” if it is filed even one day late. Six circuits generally hold that a late but otherwise correctly filed Form 1040 is not a “return” if the IRS has already assessed the filer’s tax liability for the tax year for which it is filed, because in the courts’ view a Form 1040 filed so late does not represent an honest and reasonable attempt to satisfy the tax laws. One circuit, by contrast, has held that a late but otherwise correctly filed Form 1040 can be a “return,” even if filed after assessment, so long as the form, on its face, evinces an honest and reasonable attempt to satisfy the tax laws. The IRS, for its part, agrees with petitioner that late-filed returns are “returns” but takes the position that postassessment tax debts are generally nondischargeable based on an entirely different theory that has been rejected by virtually every court to consider it. The question presented is: Whether a late but otherwise correctly filed Form 1040 is a “return” for purposes of §523(a) of the Bankruptcy Code. i)

Docket Entries

2024-11-04
Petition DENIED.
2024-10-16
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/1/2024.
2024-10-14
2024-09-30
Brief of respondent United States in opposition filed.
2024-09-03
Amicus brief of Central District Consumer Bankruptcy Attorney Association submitted.
2024-08-30
Brief amicus curiae of Central District Consumer Bankruptcy Attorney Association filed.
2024-08-30
2024-08-30
Amicus brief of A. Lavar Taylor submitted.
2024-08-30
Amicus brief of Central District Consumer Bankruptcy Attorney Association submitted.
2024-08-29
Amicus brief of Center for Taxpayer Rights submitted.
2024-08-29
Brief amici curiae of Professors Nicholas L. Georgakopoulos, et al. filed.
2024-08-29
2024-08-29
2024-08-29
Brief amicus curiae of Professors Nicholas L. Georgakopoulos, Peter Marchetti, G. Ray Warner, and Jack F. Williams filed.
2024-08-29
Amicus brief of American College of Tax Counsel submitted.
2024-08-29
Amicus brief of Professors Nicholas L. Georgakopoulos, Peter Marchetti, G. Ray Warner, and Jack F. Williams submitted.
2024-08-13
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including September 30, 2024.
2024-08-12
Motion to extend the time to file a response from August 30, 2024 to September 30, 2024, submitted to The Clerk.
2024-08-12
Motion of United States for an extension of time submitted.
2024-07-29
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due August 30, 2024)
2024-05-21
Application (23A1034) granted by Justice Kagan extending the time to file until July 29, 2024.
2024-05-17
Application (23A1034) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from May 30, 2024 to July 29, 2024, submitted to Justice Kagan.

Attorneys

A. Lavar Taylor
A. Lavar TaylorTaylor Nelson Amitrano LLP, Amicus
A. Lavar TaylorTaylor Nelson Amitrano LLP, Amicus
American College of Tax Counsel
Andrew Michael WeinerKostelanetz, LLP, Amicus
Andrew Michael WeinerKostelanetz, LLP, Amicus
Center for Taxpayer Rights
Audrey Anne PattenThe Legal Services Center of Harvard Law School, Amicus
Audrey Anne PattenThe Legal Services Center of Harvard Law School, Amicus
Central District Consumer Bankruptcy Attorney Association
Matthew David ResnikRHM LAW, LLP, Amicus
Matthew David ResnikRHM Law, LLP, Amicus
John Paul Salvador
Andrew Timothy TuttArnold & Porter Kaye Scholer, Petitioner
Andrew Timothy TuttArnold & Porter Kaye Scholer, Petitioner
Professors Nicholas L. Georgakopoulos, Peter Marchetti, G. Ray Warner, and Jack F. Williams
Stephen P Younger Withers Bergman LLP, Amicus
Stephen P Younger Withers Bergman LLP, Amicus
United States
Elizabeth B. PrelogarSolicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. PrelogarSolicitor General, Respondent