No. 24-1084
Steven M. Hohn v. United States
Amici (7)
Experienced Counsel
Tags: attorney-client-privilege constitutional-rights legal-prejudice prosecutorial-misconduct sixth-amendment trial-procedure
Key Terms:
HabeasCorpus TradeSecret
HabeasCorpus TradeSecret
Latest Conference:
2025-10-10
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether a prosecutor's intentional, unjustified intrusion into a defendant's attorney-client communications violates the Sixth Amendment without a showing of discrete, trial-specific prejudice
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
Whether a prosecutor’s inten tional, unjustified intrusion into a defendant’s atto rney-client communications violates the Sixth Amendment without a showing of discrete, trial-specific prejudice. (II)
Docket Entries
2025-10-14
Petition DENIED.
2025-09-24
Reply of petitioner Steven M. Hohn filed. (Distributed)
2025-09-24
Reply of Steven M. Hohn submitted.
2025-09-24
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/10/2025.
2025-09-04
Brief of respondent United States in opposition filed.
2025-09-04
Brief of United States in opposition submitted.
2025-07-08
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including September 4, 2025.
2025-07-07
Motion to extend the time to file a response from July 18, 2025 to September 4, 2025, submitted to The Clerk.
2025-07-07
Motion of United States for an extension of time submitted.
2025-06-04
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including July 18, 2025.
2025-06-03
Motion to extend the time to file a response from June 18, 2025 to July 18, 2025, submitted to The Clerk.
2025-06-03
Motion of United States for an extension of time submitted.
2025-05-19
Brief amicus curiae of The Cato Institute filed.
2025-05-19
Brief amici curiae of Criminal Law and Ethics Professors filed.
2025-05-19
Brief amici curiae of Current and Former Federal and State Prosecutors filed.
2025-05-19
Brief amici curiae of Criminal Law, et al. filed.
2025-05-19
Brief amicus curiae of Due Process Institute filed.
2025-05-19
Amicus brief of The Cato Institute submitted.
2025-05-19
Amicus brief of Due Process Institute submitted.
2025-05-15
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including June 18, 2025.
2025-05-14
Motion to extend the time to file a response from May 19, 2025 to June 18, 2025, submitted to The Clerk.
2025-05-14
Motion of United States for an extension of time submitted.
2025-05-02
Brief amici curiae of Tenth Circuit Federal Public Defenders filed.
2025-05-02
Brief amicus curiae of Tenth Circuit Federal Public Defenders filed.
2025-04-15
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due May 19, 2025)
2025-02-24
Application (24A755) granted by Justice Gorsuch extending the time to file until April 15, 2025.
2025-01-31
Application (24A755) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from March 16, 2025 to May 15, 2025, submitted to Justice Gorsuch.
Attorneys
Criminal Law and Ethics Professors
Michelle Shane Kallen — Steptoe LLP, Amicus
Current and Former Federal and State Prosecutors
David A. Senior — McBreen & Senior, Amicus
Due Process Institute
Douglas Eugene Litvack — Jenner & Block LLP, Amicus
Steven M. Hohn
Tenth Circuit Federal Public Defenders
The Cato Institute
United States
D. John Sauer — Solicitor General, Respondent
Moez Mansoor Kaba — Hueston Hennigan LLP, Respondent
Sarah M. Harris — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent