May a private college which receives federal funding always rely upon a 'no state action' defense in denying its employee due process or procedural fairness in a Title IX disciplinary hearing?

May a private college which receives federal funding always rely upon a “no state action” defense in denying its employee due process or procedural fairness in a Title IX disciplinary hearing? ii PARTIES TO THIS PROCEEDING Dr. David B. Porter Berea College F. Tyler Sergent iii STATEMENT OF RELATED CASES In the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky : Dr. David B. Porter v. Dr. F. Tyler Sergent and Berea College , No. 5:19-455-KKC, Judgment Entered on August 4, 2020 (on FRCP 12(b)(6) motions to dismiss); Dr. David B. Porter v. Dr. F. Tyler Sergent and Berea College , No. 5:19-455-KKC, Judgment Entered on September 28, 2022 (on FRCP 56 motions for summary judgment); Dr. David B. Porter v. Dr. F. Tyler Sergent and Berea College , No. 5:19-455-KKC, Judgment Entered on September 25, 2023 (on FRCP 59(e) motion to alter or amend judgment). In the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit : Dr. David B. Porter v. Dr. F. Tyler Sergent and Berea College , No. 23-5944, Judgment Entered on October 29, 2024.