Whether a judge can grant an extension for a defendant who has already violated the summons timeline in a civil action and failed to respond within the prescribed period

WHERE DEFENDANTS VIOLATES SUMMON IN CIVIL ACTION RULE 12(B)(4) OF THE FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE WITHIN 21 DAYS DEFENDANT ANSWERED IN 42 DAYS SERVED AND SIGNED FOR CERTIFIED AND COMPLAINT FILED ON JANUARY 10, 2023 NOW CAN DEFENDANT GET AN EXTENSION FROM THE JUDGE WHEN DEFENDANT IS ALREADY IN VIOLATION OF A SUMMONS OF A CIVIL ACTION. MUST THE COURT LET THE PLAINTIFF KNOW AND MUST THE PLAINTIFF HAVE A RIGHT TO AFFIDAVIT FROM THE DEFENDANT AND FILED WITH THE CLERK OF COURT. A DEFAULT JUDGEMENT WAS FILED BY PLAINTIFF JAMES WILLIAM HALL ON 3/8/2023 IS RIGHT THAT THE JUDGE MUST ANSWER TO A (MOTION) FILED IN THE COURT ON THIS MATTER BUT THE JUDGE REFUSED TO ANSWER TO THE IMOTION), BUT THE JUDGE GAVE AN EXTENSION AFTER 42 DAYS LATE IN A DEFAULT 3/14/2023. NOW COMES PLAINTIFF JAMES WILLIAM HALL (FILED) A (MOTION) TO THE LOWER COURT FOR A HEARING ON DISCOVERY DOCUMENTS FROM THE OTHER ATTORNEY. THE JUDGE DEPRIVED PLAINTIFF JAMES WILLIAM HALL OF THIS CONSTITUTION RIGHTS TO REPRESENT MYSELF IN COURT. (A)(1)(B) RASHAUNDA BOARD (LIED) UNDER (OAT). PETITIONER JAMES WILLIAM HALL ASK IF SHE WOULD TAKE A POLYGRAPH TEST DEFENDANTS AGREED TO IT BUT LOWER COURT DENIED. IS IT A CRIMINAL (THREAT) OR PENAL (B) CODE 422 P.C. VERBALLY WRITTEN OR ELECTRONIC COMMUNICATION DEFENDANT TO THIS CASE DORAIN DAVIS TO PETITIONER.