No. 24-1103

Caleb D. Glick v. American Bar Association

Lower Court: Fifth Circuit
Docketed: 2025-04-24
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Response Waived
Tags: antitrust-statutes constitutional-law contract-interpretation stare-decisis state-immunity supremacy-clause
Key Terms:
Antitrust DueProcess Jurisdiction
Latest Conference: 2025-05-22
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the U.S. Constitution and Texas Constitution constitute binding contracts between parties, and whether an unenumurated immunity exists to antitrust statutes

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

The following Questions presented for review are offered pursuant to the Rules of the Supreme Court of the United States ("Court Rules"), Rule 14(1)(a): 1. Whether the U.S. Constitution, and the laws derived from it, and the Texas Constitution, and the laws derived from it, are binding contracts between Petitioner, Respondent, and the governments established by both Constitutions. 2. Whether Respondent possesses an unenumurated immunity to federal and Texas antitrust statutes given the Sherman Antitrust Act, Clayton Antitrust Act, the Texas Free Enterprise and Antitrust Act of 1983 and Article 1, Section 26 of the Texas Constitution do not exempt Respondent from antitrust provisions. -i 3. Whether Petitioner and Respondent are equally bound to the U.S. Constitution, and the laws derived from it, and the Texas Constitution, and the laws derived from it, provided Respondent is a citizen of Texas pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1332(c) (2). 4. Whether Petitioner ought to be granted his requested relief by the Court or any lower tribunal given the federal and Texas antitrust laws provide for Petitioner's sought relief. 5. Whether Common Law, Stare Decisis, supersedes the legal binding of Constitutional and Statutory law, given Article VI, Clause 2 of the United States Constitution declares the U.S. Constitution, and the Laws of the United States, is the Supreme Law of the Land. -ii

Docket Entries

2025-05-27
Petition DENIED.
2025-05-06
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/22/2025.
2025-04-30
Waiver of right of respondent ABA to respond filed.
2025-03-20

Attorneys

ABA
Christopher Scott DodrillGreenberg Traurig, LLP, Respondent
Caleb D. Glick
Caleb D. Glick — Petitioner