Whether alternative means of dispute resolution are required for redress when a private contract mandates arbitration for controversies

When every right withheld must have a remedy, and every injury its proper redress I, Charles Dean of the Hood family present the following questions for review: 1. Whether Alternative Means of Dispute Resolution process is required for redress for injuries when a contract, specifically private Contract requires arbitration for controversies? 2. In Equity when Respondents are accountable to the Claimants the Respondents must respond when required during Dispute Resolution Process or their silence is their tacit acceptance of private Contract J3:16 fGsltwthghobS© and Claimed injuries? 3. Whether in Good faith the Claimants did not give the Respondents sufficient opportunity and time to respond to Claims, form any Defenses, and to Challenge private Arbitration Award SAAPH-A510A-JK within the thirty (30) day grace periods? 4. By their continued silence Respondents acknowledged the perpetual injuries evidenced in private Contract J3:16fGsltwthghobS© and 33 SUFFOLK U.L. REV. 259, that when every right when withheld must have a remedy, and every injury its proper redress? 5. When at the completion of Dispute Resolution Process when private Arbitration Award is granted private Arbitration Award SAAPH-A510A-KJ Shall be Confirmed and Enforced by district court of the United States? 6. Whether it is a violation of the Equal Protection Clause, to hold an incarcerated person, with no retained attorney and access to information, to the same deadlines for filing an appeal as non-incarcerated persons.