Did the district court misapply Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 12 and 56 in ruling on Bell's contract breach and good faith obligations, and did the court err in denying quantum meruit recovery for the plaintiff's representative work?

Did the district court misapply Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 12 and 56 by ruling that no reasonable jury could find that Bell breached its contract with the plaintiff and failed to act in good faith while fulfilling its duty to support the Representative in promoting the sale of Authorized Products and Services in Guyana during the final months of the parties’ Independent Representative Agreement? Did the court err in ruling that the plaintiffs are not entitled to recover in quantum meruit for the work they performed over six years as Bell’s Independent Representative in Guyana—work that led to multi-milliondollar agreements finalized by Bell in 2020 and 2022?