Whether Washington State courts have shown contempt for Supreme Court precedents and constitutional rights through biased judicial proceedings

1. CONTEMPT FOR THE U.S. SUPREME COURT. Here are the “two forearms” on the scale described in Axon Enterprise v. FTC, No. 21-86. Washington State courts have reached the extreme point of defiance where correction is justified. 2. RETRIBUTION AS STATE POLICY The State shows contempt for unanimous NRA v Vello, 22-842, by refusing to examine 1* Amendment rights with the required strict scrutiny standard of review. Officials are motivated by animus bolstered by court demotion into a quasisuspect class with further abuse by application of the absurd. 3. EQUAL PROTECTION OF THE LAW The State Panel also shows contempt for a long list of its own precedents. This contempt is remarkable because it includes decisions that the sitting justices wrote, including one “vigorously protecting privacy”, McGee, AP-3, written while the Panel was in the process of denying Flarity a review to protect domicile privacy. We ask the Supreme Court to return the “inviolate right to jury trial’ to the citizens of Washington State. ii 1.