Whether the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals erroneously held that Petitioners lacked standing to sue under Ex parte Young when naming the Governor and Attorney General of Michigan as defendants in a declaratory judgment action challenging the constitutionality of Michigan's Court of Claims Act

Whether the Sixth Circu it Court of Appeals erroneously held that Petitioners, who sought a declaratory judgment under the Declaratory Judgment Act that Michigan’s Court of Claims Act was uncon stitutional, lacked standing to sue because in naming the Governor of Michigan, and the Attorney General of Michigan, as defendants, they failed to name appropriate defendants under the Supreme Court’s decision in Ex parte Young, 209 U.S. 123 (1908).