No. 24-1153

Corey Schirod Smith v. John Q. Hamm, Commissioner, Alabama Department of Corrections

Lower Court: Eleventh Circuit
Docketed: 2025-05-09
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Tags: criminal-sentencing habeas-corpus ineffective-assistance mitigating-evidence postconviction-relief strickland-standard
Key Terms:
DueProcess HabeasCorpus Punishment Securities JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference: 2025-09-29
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Did the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals misapply Strickland, and its progeny, by failing to consider in its 'prejudice inquiry' the unrebutted, noncumulative postconviction lay evidence of Mr. Smith's severe, lifelong physical and emotional abuse, learned violent behavior by men against women and significant drug abuse since childhood, thereby analyzing the prejudice suffered by Mr. Smith in conflict with established precedent from this Court

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

In February 1995, Corey Smith, then 18, after a bitter break-up argument and fearing loss of his infant daughter, murdered Kimberly Brooks, the mother of their child. Mr. Smith had suffered lifelong abuse, had learned violence was an appropriate response to anger and had abused multiple drugs. Mr. Smith had reacted as taught-violently. After the offense, Mr. Smith confessed and assisted in recovering Ms. Brooks’ body. Guilt was never in dispute. The only real question was whether Mr. Smith would be sentenced to death or life imprisonment without parole. Trial counsel never conducted any investigation into any aspect of his mental health. No investigation was conducted into his physical and emotional abuse, into his drug abuse or into his learned behavior of men in his family physically abusing women. No experts were consulted. These failures deprived Mr. Smith of the opportunity to present compelling mitigating evidence, discussed below. At sentencing, counsel presented a potpourri of anecdotes, none of which provided a true picture of Mr. Smith’s horrific life and all of which, per the court, did little to mitigate. The Eleventh Circuit affirmed the dismissal of Mr. Smith’s habeas corpus petition, finding no Strickland prejudice. The issues presented here are exceptionally important because the life of Mr. Smith, now 48, is at stake. The question presented here is: Did the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals misapply Strickland , and its progeny, by ii failing to consider in its “prejudice inquiry”, the unrebutted, noncumulative postconviction lay evidence of Mr. Smith’s severe, lifelong physical and emotional abuse, learned violent behavior by men against women and significant drug abuse since childhood, thereby analyzing the prejudice suffered by Mr. Smith in conflict with established precedent from this Court. Sup. Ct. R. 10(c).

Docket Entries

2025-10-06
Petition DENIED.
2025-07-23
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/29/2025.
2025-07-21
2025-07-21
2025-07-08
Brief of Commissioner, AL Dept of Corrections in opposition submitted.
2025-07-08
Brief of respondent Commissioner, AL Dept of Corrections in opposition filed.
2025-07-08
Brief of respondent John Q. Hamm, Commissioner, Alabama Department of Corrections in opposition filed.
2025-05-23
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including July 9, 2025.
2025-05-22
Motion of Commissioner, AL Dept of Corrections for an extension of time submitted.
2025-05-22
Motion to extend the time to file a response from June 9, 2025 to July 9, 2025, submitted to The Clerk.
2025-05-07
2025-03-17
Application (24A895) granted by Justice Thomas extending the time to file until May 7, 2025.
2025-03-13
Application (24A895) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from April 7, 2025 to May 22, 2025, submitted to Justice Thomas.

Attorneys

Commissioner, AL Dept of Corrections
Henry Mitchell JohnsonAlabama Atty General, Respondent
Henry Mitchell JohnsonAlabama Atty General, Respondent
Corey Smith
Jerry KristalWeitz & Luxenberg, P.C., Petitioner
Jerry KristalWeitz & Luxenberg, P.C., Petitioner