No. 24-1157
Taylor Packwood, et al. v. County of Contra Costa, California, et al.
Response Waived
Experienced Counsel
Tags: civil-procedure domestic-relations due-process federal-jurisdiction fraud-exception rooker-feldman
Key Terms:
DueProcess FourthAmendment HabeasCorpus Privacy Jurisdiction
DueProcess FourthAmendment HabeasCorpus Privacy Jurisdiction
Latest Conference:
2025-09-29
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether there is a fraud exception to the Rooker-Feldman doctrine in domestic relations cases raising claims of a violation of due process of law
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
Whether there is a fraud exception to the RookerFeldman doctrine in domestic relations cases raising claims of a violation of due process of law.
Docket Entries
2025-10-06
Petition DENIED.
2025-06-17
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/29/2025.
2025-05-21
Waiver of right of respondents County of Contra Costa, Contra Costa Children and Family Services, et al. to respond filed.
2025-05-08
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due June 11, 2025)
Attorneys
County of Contra Costa, Contra Costa Children and Family Services, et al.
Sean M. Rodriquez — County of Contra Costa, Respondent
Sean M. Rodriquez — County of Contra Costa, Respondent
Taylor Packwood, et al.
Norman A. Pattis — Pattis & Smith, LLC, Petitioner
Norman A. Pattis — Pattis & Smith, LLC, Petitioner