No. 24-1183

Antonio Lamont Lightfoot v. United States

Lower Court: Fourth Circuit
Docketed: 2025-05-19
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (2) Experienced Counsel
Tags: categorical-approach circuit-split federal-criminal-law predicate-offense sentencing-enhancement three-strikes-law
Key Terms:
FifthAmendment Takings HabeasCorpus Immigration JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference: 2025-09-29 (distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether a categorical mismatch occurs when the elements of a predicate state offense criminalize conduct outside the enumerated offense under the three-strikes law

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

The three -strikes law, 18 U.S.C. § 3559(c), mandates a life sentence for a defendant convicted of a “serious violent felony” if the defendant has two prior convictions for “serious violent felonies,” defined to include a list of enumerated offenses. This Court uses the “categorical approach” to determine whether a state conviction qualifies as a predicate offense under federal laws with this type of formulation . The question presented, on which the circuits are deeply split, is: Whether there is a categorical mis match whe n the elements of the predicate state offense, by their plain language , criminalize conduct outside the enumerated offense, with no further inquiry required or permitted.

Docket Entries

2025-10-06
Petition DENIED.
2025-09-03
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/29/2025.
2025-08-29
Reply of Antonio Lamont Lightfoot submitted.
2025-08-29
Reply of petitioner Antonio Lamont Lightfoot filed. (Distributed)
2025-08-18
Brief of United States in opposition submitted.
2025-08-18
Brief of respondent United States in opposition filed.
2025-07-14
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including August 18, 2025.
2025-07-11
Motion of United States for an extension of time submitted.
2025-07-11
Motion to extend the time to file a response from July 17, 2025 to August 18, 2025, submitted to The Clerk.
2025-06-17
Response Requested. (Due July 17, 2025)
2025-06-10
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/26/2025.
2025-06-05
Waiver of United States of right to respond submitted.
2025-06-05
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2025-05-15
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due June 18, 2025)
2025-03-05
Application (24A839) granted by The Chief Justice extending the time to file until May 15, 2025.
2025-02-27
Application (24A839) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from March 16, 2025 to May 15, 2025, submitted to The Chief Justice.

Attorneys

Antonio Lamont Lightfoot
Richard A. SimpsonWiley Rein, LLP, Petitioner
United States
D. John SauerSolicitor General, Respondent
Moez Mansoor KabaHueston Hennigan LLP, Respondent