Whether the Sixth Circuit clerks had the authority to render judgment on dispositive motions without judicial review or proper delegation; whether unauthorized actions of Sixth Circuit clerks violate a litigant's right to have their case heard before a judge; whether the Sixth Circuit erred in denying the Petitioner's right to a fair and accurate record on appeal; whether the district court's failure to recuse violated statutory and constitutional protections

1. Whether the Sixth Circuit clerks had the author ity to render judgment on dispositive motions without judicial review or proper delegation? 2. Whether the un auth orized actions of the Sixth Circuit clerks violates a litigants’ right to have their case and controversy heard before a judge rather than a clerk? 3. Whether the Sixth Circuit erred in denying the Petitioner his right to a fair and accurate record on appeal pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 10 when the evi dence showing adulteration of the record was uncontroverted? 4. Whether the district court erred in failing recuse or assign the recusal for hearing to another judge violated § 144 and as a result the Petitioners’ fundamental rights afforded under U.S. Const. amend. V?