No. 24-1194
John Doe v. Second Judicial District Court of Nevada, Washoe County, et al.
Response Waived
Experienced Counsel
Tags: anonymous-investigation elected-officials first-amendment litigation public-figure speech-preparatory
Key Terms:
FirstAmendment Copyright TradeSecret Privacy JusticiabilityDoctri
FirstAmendment Copyright TradeSecret Privacy JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2025-09-29
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Are speech preparatory investigations expressive and subject to First Amendment protection?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
John Doe conducted an anonymous investigation of public figure s based on concerns about corruption. Two elected officials, including t he Mayor of Reno, the target of the investigation, sought to use litigation to unmask John Doe. The Nevada Supreme Court refused to apply the First Amendment to the investigation, declaring that the speech preparations were “non expressive” and “not subject to First Amendment p rotection.” The q uestion presented is: Are speech preparatory investigations expressive and subject to First Amendment protection?
Docket Entries
2025-10-06
Petition DENIED.
2025-06-25
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/29/2025.
2025-06-16
Waiver of Real Parties in Interest Hillary Schieve and Vaughn Hartung of right to respond submitted.
2025-06-16
Waiver of right of respondent Real Parties in Interest Hillary Schieve and Vaughn Hartung to respond filed.
2025-05-19
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due June 23, 2025)
Attorneys
John Doe
Michael Lee Francisco — First & Fourteenth PLLC, Petitioner
Michael Lee Francisco — First & Fourteenth PLLC, Petitioner
Real Parties in Interest Hillary Schieve and Vaughn Hartung
Adam Dmitri Hosmer-Henner — McDonald Carano LLP, Respondent
Adam Dmitri Hosmer-Henner — McDonald Carano LLP, Respondent