Whether the Appellate Court improperly ruled on climate change claims and denied declaratory and injunctive relief

This petition is extremely important and urgent that needs this court’s immediate intervention, especially it is simple, small, and doesn’t need much time to resolve. It challenges the wide spread false claims that “Burning Fossil Fuel is Causing a Harmful Global Warming”. Which petitioner proved its falsity with real science and numbers, and insists on calling it a “Hoax”. However, the Court insists on calling it real without any proof whatsoever or disputing petitioner’s facts. This Hoax misled and is misleading many Courts, and a huge number of people. Enforcing it resulted, and will result, in conflicting decisions by the Courts, legal battles to enforce it and others opposing it, serious damages to the public, and wasting trillions of dollars we don’t have. This Court should grant this petition urgently without weighing too much on the procedures or the technicalities, but mainly, as a matter of extreme importance and urgency to the entire world, the public, the economy, the future of this country, and the future of our justice system that is being destroyed by politicizing it. Questions Presented: I. The Appellate Court erred in not reversing the District Court’s ruling that Farag’s motion for a declaratory relief is frivolous, and not reversing its declaration that the hoax is real. Il. The Appellate Court erred in not granting the injunctive relief. III. The Appellate Court erred in not disqualifying HJ Daniel. IV. The Appellate Court erred in denying Farag’s request to file electronically. 1