Martin Akerman v. District of Columbia, et al.
DueProcess
Whether the use of automated systems like 'Speed Camera Doe' for issuing citations without human oversight violates procedural due process protections under the Fifth Amendment by denying individuals the right to confront their accusers or challenge the evidence against them
• Whether the use of automated systems like "Speed Camera Doe" for issuing citations without human oversight violates procedural due process protections under the Fifth Amendment by denying individuals the right to confront their accusers or challenge the evidence against them. • Whether the deletion and mischaracterization of the Petitioner's filings by the Clerk of the District of Columbia Court of Appeals, coupled with procedural irregularities, violate the First Amendment right to petition the government for redress of grievances and an implicit Second Amendment right to be "armed" with accurate information for legal defense. • Whether the lack of oversight in automated enforcement systems poses systemic risks to constitutional rights, necessitating judicial intervention to ensure accountability similar to historical corporate governance reforms.