Is custodial interrogation by a child-protection caseworker subject to Miranda's requirements where the interrogation concerns matters that may trigger the caseworker's legal duty to report to law enforcement?

Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 (1966) , bars the admission in criminal trials of statements elicited in custodial interrogations unless defendants were advised of their rights to remain silent, to counsel, and against selfincrimination . To ensure that Miranda is not circumvented, this Court has held that its requirements are not limited to law enforcement officials. The Question Presented is: Is custodial interrogation by a child-protection caseworker subject to Miranda ’s requirements where the interrogat ion concerns matters that may trigger the caseworker ’s legal duty to report to law enforcement?