Whether the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals correctly interpreted laws regarding counsel disqualification, statute of limitations, and constitutional rights in a case involving Equifax Information Services LLC

No question identified. : QUESTIONS IN REVIEW Was the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals correct in their Interpretation of the laws regarding the disqualification of the Respondents counsel? When is the counsel of the Respondent a direct party to the harm caused to the Petitioner? Was the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals correct to make its interpretation of the law when deciding to deny the Petitioner his right to Amend his Complaint? Was the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals Correct in their Interpretation of the statute of limitations when determining that the two-year Statute of Limitations applies and not the Three year “Discovery Rule ” statute of Limitations? Based on the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals interpretation of the Laws, Rules, Case Standards, and Constitutional Provisions in this matter. Was the Petitioner Denied his Civil and Constitutional Rights to Equal Protection of Law and a Due Process of Law under the 14th Amendment of the United States Constitution? Was the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals correct when making the Decision not to Strike the Index of the Excerpts and Excerpts of the Record although i Respondent ’s initial filing of the Excerpts excluded all the Exhibits related to all filings of the Record? And in the corrected set of the Excerpts of the Record the Respondents ’ filings were un referenceable to the alleged Index of the Record? Was the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals correct in their decision not to Strike the Respondents Answering Brief although the Respondent openly admitted they violated the Circuit Rules when making references directly to the Record? And failed to properly reference the Excerpts of the alleged Record in their Answering Brief? n