Whether the Eighth Circuit erred in affirming dismissal judgments for multiple respondents when the amended complaint allegedly pleads direct and circumstantial evidence of race-based discriminatory intent under various federal and state law claims

Whether Eighth Circuit erred in holding and affirming dismissal judgment overlooking District Court manifested errors and abuses of discretion entered dismissal order and judgment for failure state claim with prejudice on June 22, 2022, for City of Springfield respondents, when amended complaint pleads direct, circumstantial evidence of race-based discriminatory intent, use of and prima facie and intentional discrimination, as such pleads claims under 42 USC 1981, 1983, 1985 and the state law public accommodation contract 210.00 RSMo claim? Whether Eighth Circuit erred in holding and affirming dismissal judgment overlooking District Court manifested errors and abuses of discretion entered dismissal order and judgment for failure state claim with prejudice on June 22, 2022, for Patel, Laxmi Enterprises and Ozark Inn respondents, when amended complaint pleads direct, circumstantial evidence of race-based discriminatory intent, use of and prima facie and intentional discrimination, as such pleads claims under 42 USC 1981, 1983, 1985 and the state law public accommodation contract 210.00 RSMo claim? Whether Eighth Circuit erred in holding and affirming dismissal judgment overlooking District Court manifested errors and abuses of discretion entered dismissal order and judgment for failure state claim without prejudice on February 23, 2023, for respondent Seth Gomez, when amended complaint pleads direct, circumstantial evidence of race-based discriminatory intent, use of and prima facie and intentional discrimination, as such pleads claims under 42 USC 1981, 1983, 1985 and the state law public accommodation contract 210.00 RSMo claim? Whether Eighth Circuit erred in holding and affirming dismissal judgment overlooking District Court manifested errors and abuses of discretion entered sua sponte dismissal order and judgment for failure state claim without prejudice on August 7, 2023, for respondents Baily D. Stoddard, Domnic L. Jordon, Amanda L. Simrin, Rachel Slobig, when amended complaint pleads direct, circumstantial evidence of race-based discriminatory intent, and prima facie and intentional discrimination, as such pleads claims under 42 USC 1981, 1983, 1985 and the state law public accommodation contract 210.00 RSMo claim? Whether the Eighth Circuit erred and abuse discretion affirming dismissal judgment overlooking District Court abuses of discretion, when arbitrarily entered sua sponte dismissal order for failure state claim in error on August 7, 2023, for respondents Baily D. Stoddard, Domnic L. Jordon, Amanda L. Simrin, Rachel Slobig notwithstanding dismissal order should have vacate and enter default judgments against respondents, as matter of law for failure to appear, answer or defend complaint timely?