No. 24-14
James R. Zuegel v. Marco Garcia, et al.
Response Waived
Tags: 42-usc-1983 civil-rights constitutional-claim conviction conviction-challenge probation section-1983 spencer-v-kemna standing
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity FourthAmendment DueProcess HabeasCorpus CriminalProcedure Privacy JusticiabilityDoctri
SocialSecurity FourthAmendment DueProcess HabeasCorpus CriminalProcedure Privacy JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2024-09-30
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Does this Court's opinion in Spencer v. Kemna, 523 U.S. 1 (1998), permit an individual, who has completed his probation, to pursue a 42 U.S.C. section 1983 civil rights action establishing the unconstitutionality of his conviction?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED Does this Court’s opinion in Spencer v. Kemna, 523 U.S. 1 (1998), permit an individual, who has completed his probation, to pursue a 42 U.S.C. section 1983 civil rights action establishing the unconstitutionality of his conviction?
Docket Entries
2024-10-07
Petition DENIED.
2024-08-21
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/30/2024.
2024-08-07
Waiver of right of respondent Marco Garcia, et al. to respond filed.
2024-07-03
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due August 8, 2024)
Attorneys
James Zuegel
Violet Elizabeth Grayson — Attorney at Law, Petitioner
Violet Elizabeth Grayson — Attorney at Law, Petitioner
Marco Garcia, et al.
Angela Louise Killian — Kaufman Dolowich, LLP, Respondent
Angela Louise Killian — Kaufman Dolowich, LLP, Respondent