Lena Lasher v. Peter Riccio, et al.
AdministrativeLaw DueProcess Takings
Did the Appellate Division err in dismissing a complaint alleging identity theft and anti-Asian racism as a potential hate crime, thereby potentially violating constitutional rights?
QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Is Identity Theft an exceptional circumstance to reinstate a complaint? 2. Did the Appellate Division err in finding no error by the Middlesex County Superior Court of New Jersey in NOT granting Lena’s complaint of IDENTITY THEFT and ANTI-ASIAN RACISM, a HATE CRIME, thus denying the Plaintiff her constitutional guaranteed right to pursue the First, Fifth and Fourteenth Amendment rights? 3. Did the Appellate Division err in dismissing Plaintiffs case on ground of failure to prosecute when it was Plaintiff’s attorney who not only failed to prosecute the case but also told the Plaintiff that he was prosecuting her case. 4. Did the Court of Appeals erred in dismissing Appellant’s case because the “Appellant did not serve summons upon Defendants Riccio and Defendants DellaVentura, because the appellant DID.”