No. 24-148

Wittaya Theerachanon v. FIA Cards Services, et al.

Lower Court: Delaware
Docketed: 2024-08-09
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Response WaivedRelisted (2)
Tags: abuse-of-process bad-debt-deduction contract-dispute court-filing judicial-misconduct legal-procedure
Key Terms:
DueProcess Privacy JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference: 2024-12-06 (distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the pattern of abuse of process by the Respondent in multiple court proceedings constitutes a violation of legal standards for fair adjudication

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION PRESENTED Three Times Abuse of Process happened to the Petitioner in three Court Proceedings. They occurred in the same pattern. The Respondent controlled Judges . repossessed the Judgment in The Respondent’s favor. The analysis found that the pattern of abuse of process happened to the Petitioner is The Respondent’s Recidivism business activities to increase the percentage of the double benefits they receive after using the NPL accounts filling as the Bad Debt Deduction to be 100%. Are The Petitioner and Others under the same law as The Respondent? (FIA Cards Services N.A., Bank of America N.A.) No Man Is Above The Law, And No Man Is Below It. , (Former United States President Theodore Roosevelt.)

Docket Entries

2024-12-09
Rehearing DENIED.
2024-11-19
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/6/2024.
2024-11-12
2024-10-15
Petition DENIED.
2024-09-18
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/11/2024.
2024-09-03
Waiver of right of respondent Bank of America, N.A., successor entity to FIA Cards Services to respond filed.
2024-08-06
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due September 9, 2024)

Attorneys

Bank of America, N.A., successor entity to FIA Cards Services
Matthew Allen FitzgeraldMcGuireWoods LLP, Respondent
Wittaya Theerachanon
Wittaya Theerachanon — Petitioner