Whether the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals improperly interpreted state law, federal bankruptcy rules, and Erie doctrine principles in its decision

QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Did the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals, decision below, conflict with other similar decisions of other U.S. Circuit Courts of Appeals as well as decide an important federal question in a way that conflicts with decisions by the Georgia Supreme Court, Georgia’s court of last resort? 2. Did the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals create federal common law at odds with Petitioner’s statecreated rights, depriving Petitioner of the process due him under State law and violating the federalism principles of Erie R. Co. v. Tompkins, 304 U.S. 64 (1938)? 3. Did the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals commit reversible error by refusing to follow the law of the highest court in the State of Georgia, by affirming the U.S. District Court’s order, which affirmed the Bankruptcy Court’s order deeming the newly concocted means chosen by to revive his judgment, substantially complied with the law of the State of Georgia for reviving judgment? 4. Did the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals commit reversible error by its misunderstanding and misapplying the Federal Bankruptcy Rules of Procedure?