No. 24-151

United States v. Palestine Liberation Organization, et al.

Lower Court: Second Circuit
Docketed: 2024-08-12
Status: Judgment Issued
Type: Paid
Relisted (2) Experienced Counsel
Tags: due-process fifth-amendment legislative-jurisdiction palestinian-authority personal-jurisdiction terrorism-civil-suits
Key Terms:
ERISA DueProcess FifthAmendment FourthAmendment CriminalProcedure Trademark Privacy JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference: 2024-12-06 (distributed 2 times)
Related Cases: 24-20 (Vide)
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the Promoting Security and Justice for Victims of Terrorism Act's method of establishing personal jurisdiction over the Palestine Liberation Organization and Palestinian Authority complies with the Due Process Clause of the Fifth Amendment

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION PRESENTED In the Promoting Security and Justice for Victims of Terrorism Act of 2019 (PSJVTA), Pub. L. No. 116-94, Div. J, Tit. IX, § 903, 133 Stat. 3082, Congress provided that the Palestine Liberation Organization and the Palestinian Authority “shall be deemed to have consented to personal jurisdiction” in certain terrorism-related civil suits if they took specified actions in the future: (a) made payments to designees or family members of terrorists who injured or killed U.S. nationals, or (b) maintained certain premises or conducted particular activities in the United States. 18 U.S.C. 2334(e)(1) (Supp. IV 2022). The question presented is whether the PSJVTA’s means of establishing personal jurisdiction complies with the Due Process Clause of the Fifth Amendment. (1)

Docket Entries

2025-07-22
Judgment Issued.
2025-02-28
Brief of Palestinian Authority and Palestine Liberation Organization submitted.
2025-02-19
CIRCULATED
2025-02-13
Record received electronically from the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit and available with the Clerk.
2025-02-13
Record requested from the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit.
2024-12-30
Motion of United States for an extension of time submitted.
2024-12-02
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/6/2024.
2024-11-06
Reply of petitioner United States filed. (Distributed)
2024-11-06
Reply of United States submitted.
2024-11-06
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/22/2024.
2024-08-28
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including October 18, 2024.
2024-08-27
Motion to extend the time to file a response from September 11, 2024 to October 18, 2024, submitted to The Clerk.
2024-08-27
Motion of Palestinian Authority and Palestine Liberation Organization for an extension of time submitted.
2024-08-23
2024-08-23
Brief of Miriam Fuld et al. in support submitted.
2024-08-08
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due September 11, 2024)

Attorneys

Miriam Fuld et al.
Kent A. YalowitzArnold & Porter Kaye Scholer, LLP, Respondent
Kent A. YalowitzArnold & Porter Kaye Scholer, LLP, Respondent
Palestinian Authority and Palestine Liberation Organization
Gassan Adnan BaloulSquire Patton Boggs (US) LLP, Respondent
Gassan Adnan BaloulSquire Patton Boggs (US) LLP, Respondent
Mitchell Rand BergerPatton Boggs LLP, Respondent
Mitchell Rand BergerSquire Patton Boggs (US) LLP, Respondent
United States
D. John SauerSolicitor General, Petitioner
D. John SauerSolicitor General, Petitioner
Elizabeth B. PrelogarSolicitor General, Petitioner
Sarah M. HarrisActing Solicitor General, Petitioner