United States v. Palestine Liberation Organization, et al.
ERISA DueProcess FifthAmendment FourthAmendment CriminalProcedure Trademark Privacy JusticiabilityDoctri
Whether the Promoting Security and Justice for Victims of Terrorism Act's method of establishing personal jurisdiction over the Palestine Liberation Organization and Palestinian Authority complies with the Due Process Clause of the Fifth Amendment
QUESTION PRESENTED In the Promoting Security and Justice for Victims of Terrorism Act of 2019 (PSJVTA), Pub. L. No. 116-94, Div. J, Tit. IX, § 903, 133 Stat. 3082, Congress provided that the Palestine Liberation Organization and the Palestinian Authority “shall be deemed to have consented to personal jurisdiction” in certain terrorism-related civil suits if they took specified actions in the future: (a) made payments to designees or family members of terrorists who injured or killed U.S. nationals, or (b) maintained certain premises or conducted particular activities in the United States. 18 U.S.C. 2334(e)(1) (Supp. IV 2022). The question presented is whether the PSJVTA’s means of establishing personal jurisdiction complies with the Due Process Clause of the Fifth Amendment. (1)