Whether the district court and 7th Circuit improperly dismissed a pro se litigant's constitutional challenges to administrative law proceedings without addressing substantive legal questions

QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Did the Federal District court, and the 7th circuit court of appeals court err in summarily dismissing my lawsuit, without addressing the questions of law, in calling the questions “frivolous” “sovereign citizen type arguments”? The summary dismissal seems . a conspiracy to avoid answering the constitutional questions that go against present practice. 2. Are all executive branch administrative laws, quasi laws? I was charged with a felony under administrative code and jailed. 3. Do the people have the right to a Grand Jury ; review before being charged with a felony/capital crime? No Grand Jury was held in the matter. 4. Does the 6th Amendment right to demand the “Nature and cause” of charges from the accuser include revealing the type of law jurisdiction attempted? I demanded the nature and cause, not answered as to type of jurisdiction, etc. ‘ 5. Is an accuser required to reveal their standing to sue, status, and Nexus with the accused as part of the Nature and cause of the charges? My accuser is named as “THE STATE OF WISCONSIN’, a fictitious entity of unknown standing and nexus, which I need ; revealed to defend. 6. Is the STATE OF WISCONSIN violating my federal rights by attempting forcing me, alivingnatural man, into subjection to administrative law without my consent or agreement and over my objection? I didn’t consent or agree and did strongly object. ii 7. Does an administrative tribunal hearing an administrative accusation, have jurisdiction over those who do not consent to the jurisdiction and are not of a ; status subject to the administrative law being used to intrude into a living man’s pursuit of happiness? The tribunal claimed to have jurisdiction without evidence placed on the record as to administrative nexus. 8. Did the framers. of our Constitution establish states as sovereign entities, immune from responsibility and suit? I stand on Chisolm v. Georgia, ruled on by Justices who were constitutional framers, who ruled ; against that idea. 9. Did the 11th Amendment establish states immunity from being sued by its masters, the citizens of the same state, when the 11th Amendment does not say that? States are servants of the citizen not sovereign masters like the king of England was-when they cause ~ damages, they are to be held responsible. 10. Do Wisconsin State officials have immunity from suit for damages when acting in ministerial capacity over administrative quasi law? I was arrested at gunpoint, jailed by state actors, forced to pay bail in something other than gold and silver coin to get out from behind the bars. I posted bail, which payment was paid without prejudice, and signed without prejudice. 11. Can rights be deprived to me because I am regarded by the district court and 7th circuit as part . of a certain group or type of people? The District court, . ; and 7the circuit labeled me as a “sovereign citizen type” making “frivolous sovereign citizen type argu iii ments” that don’t need to be dealt with. The questions arise from direct quotes from the constitutions of our great nation, and some have been dealt with before, leaving contradictions and opposing rulings are in effect that need to be resolved by the Supreme Court. 12. Ifan entity has something against me, do they need to follow constitution judicial due process to interfere in my pursuit of happiness? I am not a licensee, and claim to be free from administrative law subjection and involuntary servitude. I realize I am responsible under common law and judicial law. 13. Right to a competent atty? The attorney I had retained refused to ask foundational questions telling me he didn’t understand the constitution. I have been unable to get a commitment from an attorney who is willing to assist asking the questions. The administrative court judge ruled I had to find an attorney or I ; would be, by being unable to retain one, by inaction, , waiving my right to an attorney and I would be forced to go to trial on my own. 14. Sh