Is the case proceeding valid and consistent with due process when courts refuse to recuse judges and disqualify attorneys who lack proper oaths of office and federal bar admission?

QUESTIONS PRESENTED Under the due process clause of the Fifth Amendment, it is well established that: (i) a Judge who lacks an Oath of Office cannot preside over a case; (ii) a Judge cannot be a Judge at his own trial or when he has a conflict of interest in the outcome of | the case; (iii) an attorney cannot practice laws at U.S. District Court unless he/she is admitted to the federal bar of that federal court; and (iv) Corporations and LLCs cannot represent themselves. In this case, , despite the undeniable evidence that the presiding judge and attorneys do not have an oath of office, the United States District Court for the Eastern District . of Tennessee (or EDTN), the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals (or SCCA) refuse to disqualify them. Besides this, these latest court unlawfully let professional corporations represent themselves as pro se on disputed facts of issues. As the Petitioner , Mawule Tepe (or Tepe) challenged the jurisdiction of EDTN, the SCCA failed to rule on the Petition. According to the Supreme Court, when the challenge ; is raised in timely manner, it will have an effect of unravelling the cases’ proceeding. An impartial district court is necessary to ensure due process. Is the case proceeding valid and consistent with the due process when the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee (or EDTN), the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals (or SCCA) refuse to recuse Honorable U.S. District ; Judge Clifton L Corker when this latest failed to Wy f ii disclose his Foreign Registration and Anti-Bribery Statement with Affidavit in Support, Surety Bonds, and Oath of Office? Is the case proceeding valid and consistent with the due process when the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee (or EDTN), the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals (or SCCA) refuse to recuse Honorable U.S. District Judge Clifton L Corker and Honorable U.S. Magistrate Judge Christopher H Steger when they are judges at their own trial and failed to recuse themselves despite the fact that not only they have case(s) pending against them but also they have a conflict of interest in the outcome of the lawsuit(s)? Is the case proceeding valid and consistent with the due process when the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee (or EDTN), the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals (or SCCA) refuse to disqualify attorneys Lucille Latimore Lattimore Nelson, William Stewart Rutchow, (and their law firm Ogletree Deakins Nash Smoak & Stewart P.C.), Emily Louise Nenni and her law firm Javitch Block LLC, Frankie Neil Spero and his law firm Bradley Arrant Boult Cummings LLP, Derek Wayne Mullins, and Justin Michael Sveadas and their law firm Baker Donelson Bearman Caldwell & Berkowitz P.C. when they failed to disclose their respective oath of office and certificate of admission to the federal bar of EDTN? Are cases’ proceeding valid and consistent with the due process when the Petitioner is denied ~ access to the court at EDTN as well as the right to confront or to challenge in violation of the Petitioner’ Sixth Amendment’s Rights? / iv :