Whether an endorsed remand order without a certified remand order violates statutory requirements under 28 U.S.C. § 1443 and Supreme Court precedent, and whether consolidating federal removal cases without proper notification violates due process rights

QUESTIONS PRESENTED Whether an endorsed remand order on a new subsequent federal removal case . with new ground filed under 28 U.S.C. § 1448, without issuance of a certified remand order, is a valid method to transfer jurisdiction from the federal court to the state court, against the statutory requirement of a certified remand order per 28 U.S.C. § 1447(¢) and the controlling precedent set by BP v. Mayor of Baltimore. Whether the consolidation of a new open federal removal case with an old, closed case without proper notification or opportunity to respond, particularly for pro se litigants, violates due process rights. i i : | j il } ;