No. 24-17
Devas Multimedia Private Limited v. Antrix Corp. Ltd., et al.
Tags: civil-procedure district-court-jurisdiction due-process foreign-sovereign-immunities foreign-sovereign-immunities-act minimum-contacts personal-jurisdiction service-of-process statutory-interpretation
Key Terms:
Arbitration DueProcess FifthAmendment JusticiabilityDoctri
Arbitration DueProcess FifthAmendment JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2024-09-30
Related Cases:
23-1201
(Vide)
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the exercise of personal jurisdiction over a foreign state under the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act requires satisfaction of the minimum-contacts test
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED Under the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act, โ[p]ersonal jurisdiction over a foreign state shall exist as to every claim for relief over which the district courts have jurisdiction under subsection (a) where service has been made under section 1608 of this title.โ 28 U.S.C. ยง 1330(b). The question presented is: Whether the exercise of personal jurisdiction over a foreign state under the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act requires satisfaction of the minimum-contacts test.
Docket Entries
2025-07-07
Judgment Issued.
2024-11-27
Record requested from the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.
2024-11-22
SET FOR ARGUMENT on Monday, March 3, 2025.
2024-08-21
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/30/2024.
2024-08-20
Reply of petitioner Devas Multimedia Private Limited filed. (Distributed)
2024-08-20
Reply of Devas Multimedia Private Limited submitted.
2024-08-06
Brief of Antrix Corp., Ltd., et al. in opposition submitted.
2024-07-03
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due August 8, 2024)
2024-04-30
Application (23A966) granted by Justice Kagan extending the time to file until July 5, 2024.
2024-04-25
Application (23A966) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from May 6, 2024 to July 5, 2024, submitted to Justice Kagan.
Attorneys
4 Stratford Square Mall Holdings LLC
Brent W. Procida — Venable LLP, Respondent
Antrix Corp. Ltd., et al.
Carter G. Phillips — Sidley Austin LLP, Respondent
Carter G. Phillips — Sidley Austin LLP, Respondent
Antrix Corp., Ltd., et al.
Amanda Shafer Berman — Crowell & Moring LLP, Respondent
Amanda Shafer Berman — Crowell & Moring LLP, Respondent
Devas Multimedia Private Limited
Aaron Michael Streett — Baker Botts, L.L.P., Petitioner
Aaron Michael Streett — Baker Botts, L.L.P., Petitioner