No. 24-170
Jake Delahney Taylor v. United States
Response Waived
Tags: child-pornography circuit-split federal-criminal-law lascivious-exhibition statutory-interpretation visual-depiction
Key Terms:
JusticiabilityDoctri
JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2024-09-30
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the terms 'visual depiction' and 'lascivious exhibition' in 18 U.S.C. Chapter 110 refer to the same or different things in the context of child pornography statutes
Question Presented (from Petition)
QUESTION PRESENTED Chapter 110 of Title 18 of the U.S. Code criminalizes the production and distribution of “visual depictions” of minors engaged in “sexually explicit conduct.” One sort of “sexually explicit conduct” is “lascivious exhibition of the anus, genitals, or pubic area of any person.” The question presented, about which the courts of appeals are squarely in conflict, is: Do the statutory terms “visual depiction” and “lascivious exhibition” refer to the same, or different things? (ii)
Docket Entries
2024-10-07
Petition DENIED.
2024-09-11
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/30/2024.
2024-09-05
Waiver of United States of right to respond submitted.
2024-09-05
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2024-08-14
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due September 16, 2024)
2024-07-10
Application (24A1) granted by Justice Alito extending the time to file until August 15, 2024.
2024-07-01
Application (24A1) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from July 15, 2024 to September 13, 2024, submitted to Justice Alito.
Attorneys
Jake Taylor
Mark William Bennett — Bennett & Bennett, Petitioner
Mark William Bennett — Bennett & Bennett, Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent