Whether the Modesto Police Department can ignore evidence in a suspicious death investigation and potentially commit perjury in court proceedings

QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1..Whether Modesto Police can ignore witnesses in a very suspicious death investigation and lose crucial evidence of the murder in the first degree when the Stanislaus County Coroner ruled the death “Undetermined.” 2. Whether the Modesto Police can lie in California Superior Court, Stanislaus County when they swore under oath that Angela Kalanta died from an “Accidental” overdose. (Perjury PC 118 California) 8. Whether California Superior Court clerk can lie to Defendant about his court date and deny continuance for Defendant who was sick on her court date, resulting in the Defendants Richard and Christine losing a case by default for non-appearance when both defendants were/are disabled and living in different ; State than California even though Defendants paid $65.00 each to appear by phone. Judge in that case denied Christine and Richard both appearances in the first hearing, the judge was disqualified in the original hearing and a new Judge denied both Defendants ; telephonic appearance, even though formally requested. 4. Whether it is legal or ethical for a police _ department to have an opinion about a murder when one of the suspects was a past employee of the same © police department. 5. Whether the ‘closed police report’? State of California is making it easier for an organized crime conspiracy. 6. Whether Petitioners have Statutory Standing under RICO Civil property and business damages clause. ii 7. Whether ‘Property’ includes Petitioners home | and loss of income. : 8. Whether a pattern of predicate crimes, alleged by Petitioners, and resolution in the murders of Angela, Joseph Toht and Ashley Henderson qualifies for RICO Civil and or RICO Criminal violation. 9. Whether Richard Douglas, the Defendant in . the Stanislaus Slander suit can be legally served via U.S. mail at his Father’s residence in a different State five months after the case was closed. 10. Can the Modesto Police Department ignore the Federal Court Summons? They never appeared nor responded to the Court order to appear or defend. 11. Why was not this case referred to the Attorney General since it has murder by Organized Crime ; , member Kimberly J. Hurtt-Buhrman and Police coverup involved? ; 12. Statutory Standing-Statute of Limitations issue [RICO] Dismissal by Sua Sponte, of the Modesto Police Department. 13. Immunity issue. Modesto Police lied in Stanislaus Superior Court case. .’ 14, Failure to State a claim question: Harm to his “business or property.” ‘ 15. Proximate cause question _ 16. Statute of Limitations issue 2019 and 2024 ; latest predicate acts documented in record herein associate attack on 6-18-2024 on being, predicate acts. 17. “Documentary material” Original Complaint [ignored recording by courts] . : 18. Whether “The SEPARATE ACCRUAL RULE” applies here. : iv :