No. 24-195

Bensam Swakeen v. Mary S. Pandian, et al.

Lower Court: Second Circuit
Docketed: 2024-08-21
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Tags: bankruptcy-fraud bankruptcy-procedure due-process financial-disclosure judicial-misconduct summary-judgment
Key Terms:
Securities
Latest Conference: 2024-10-18
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the bankruptcy court improperly handled summary judgment and financial disclosure procedures in a complex bankruptcy case involving potential financial misconduct

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTIONS PRESENTED ° 1. Sufficient time riot provided for opposition to' summary judgment 2. Trustee’s office failed to provide personal documents on record 3. Counsel did not provide documents on time 4. Why had Bankruptcy court Judge Honorable Jil Mazer-Marino not take action on this major issue? 5. Appellees are rich enough to return this money to the Appellant 6. This is the second bankruptcy they are claiming as a Business Bankruptcy for making illegal money 7. The Appellees present family income is approx. $25,500 per month 8. An investigation should be conducted on the financial soundness of Appellees, their daughter Dr. Emilin Pandian, and son, Frederick Pandian, CFO. Both are co-debtors in this Bankruptcy case filed by Appellees. This should include their income, tax filings, W2s, etc. : , ii

Docket Entries

2024-10-21
Petition DENIED.
2024-10-02
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/18/2024.
2024-06-10
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due September 20, 2024)

Attorneys

Bensam Swakeen
Bensam Swakeen — Petitioner
Bensam Swakeen — Petitioner