Whether the Tenth Circuit improperly dismissed claims of fraudulently procured jurisdiction and applied Younger abstention to preclude review of a parent's fundamental rights under the National Security Act

QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Whether the Tenth Circuit District Court and the Federal Appeals Court failed to address the specific and substantial allegation that the state court fraudulently procured personal and subject matter jurisdiction in the state court case.? 2. Whether the dismissal and abstention under the Younger doctrine by the lower courts improperly precluded the Petitioner from having his claims of fraudulent jurisdiction procurement thoroughly reviewed and/adjudicated.? 3. Whether the National Security Act can be lawfully applied to deprive a parent of their fundamental right to parent in a case where the court's personal and subject matter jurisdiction has been fraudulently procured? 1