No. 24-216

Advance Colorado, et al. v. Jena Griswold, Colorado Secretary of State

Lower Court: Tenth Circuit
Docketed: 2024-08-28
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Amici (1)Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (2) Experienced Counsel
Tags: ballot-measures first-amendment government-speech legislative-interference petition-rights tax-reduction
Key Terms:
FirstAmendment DueProcess
Latest Conference: 2025-02-21 (distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Does the government-speech doctrine immunize state efforts to compel false and pejorative language on ballot initiative petitions that undermine tax reduction measures?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION PRESENTED The Colorado Legislature and the Governor of Colorado are hostile to ballot measures that would reduce state tax revenue. After several tax reduction measures nevertheless received a majority of the vote in Colorado, the Legislature enacted the “Ballot Measure Fiscal Transparency Act of 2021,” which is codified at Colo. Rev. Stats. § 1-40-106(e). This legislation targets tax-cut initiatives specifically by compelling that the ballot title “must begin” with language stating that the tax cut “will reduce funding for state expenditures that include but are not limited to” programs like health and human services programs, K-12 education, and corrections and judicial operations. The language must be included in the ballot title and printed on ballot initiative petitions circulated by Petitioners, even in cases where it is demonstrably false. This petition thus presents the following questions: 1. Does the government-speech doctrine completely immunize Colorado’s intentional efforts to undermine Petitioners’ ballot measures, by forcing them to include false and perjorative language on the petition that they circulate to voters for signatures?

Docket Entries

2025-02-24
Petition DENIED.
2025-02-04
2025-02-04
Reply of Advance Colorado, et al. submitted.
2025-02-03
Brief of Advance Colorado, et al. in opposition submitted.
2025-01-22
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/21/2025.
2025-01-03
Brief of respondent Jena Griswold, Colorado Secretary of State in opposition filed.
2025-01-03
Brief of Jena Griswold, Colorado Secretary of State in opposition submitted.
2024-10-21
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including January 3, 2025.
2024-10-18
Motion to extend the time to file a response from November 4, 2024 to January 3, 2025, submitted to The Clerk.
2024-10-03
Response Requested. (Due November 4, 2024)
2024-09-27
2024-09-25
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/11/2024.
2024-09-20
Waiver of right of respondent Jena Griswold, Colorado Secretary of State to respond filed.
2024-08-26
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due September 27, 2024)
2024-07-12
Application (24A6) granted by Justice Gorsuch extending the time to file until August 24, 2024.
2024-07-01
Application (24A6) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from July 25, 2024 to September 23, 2024, submitted to Justice Gorsuch.

Attorneys

Advance Colorado, et al.
William E. TrachmanMountain States Legal Foundation, Petitioner
William E. TrachmanMountain States Legal Foundation, Petitioner
Jena Griswold, Colorado Secretary of State
Shannon Wells StevensonColorado Department of Law, Respondent
Shannon Wells StevensonColorado Department of Law, Respondent
The Buckeye Institute
Jay Randall CarsonThe Buckeye Institute, Amicus
Jay Randall CarsonThe Buckeye Institute, Amicus