Does the Supreme Court of California's narrow test for an 'acquittal' under the Fifth Amendment conflict with this Court's precedent?

QUESTION PRESENTED The Fifth Amendment’s Double Jeopardy Clause bars retrial whenever a court’s order dismissing a criminal case constitutes an “acquittal.” Under this Court’s broad definition, an “acquittal” includes a finding that the evidence is insufficient to convict and also any other ruling which relates to the ultimate question of guilt or innocence. The Supreme Court of California excludes some of those rulings from its definition of an “acquittal” under the Fifth Amendment. The California Court limits an “acquittal” only to circumstances where the record clearly shows that the judge correctly applied the substantial evidence standard. Does the Supreme Court of California’s narrow test for an “acquittal” under the Fifth Amendment conflict with this Court’s precedent? (i)