Whether federal courts have jurisdiction to order patent co-inventors added to foreign patents under the WIPO Patent Cooperation Treaty and Federal Circuit precedent

QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. As Congress has signed the United States of America to the rules and stipulations of the WIPO Patent Cooperation Treaty and the Federal Circuit through Voda v. Cordis, 476 F.3d 887 (2007), ruled that Federal Courts do not have jurisdiction over foreign patents, was the ruling by the District Court that the Patentee and Assignee take the necessary ; steps to add new co-inventors to foreign patents . where said co-inventors had not assigned its claimed rights to the Assignee of record in violation of these rules, the Federal Circuit ruling, and the international Patent Cooperation Treaty? 2. Regarding foreign and domestic patents, where a Patentee has assigned all patent rights to an Assignee, is it moot for a district court to order that Patentee to add co-inventors? 3. Where claimed co-inventors from another country have directed themselves through a company from another country with a fictitious “obligation to . assign” their claimed inventive rights to a subsidiary US company, registered as domestic, is this not a fraud on the court? 4, Are frauds on the court such as changing the core of the argument after discovery, perjury, subornation of perjury, and directly lying to the court by : attorneys when questioned by the court, reasons to dismiss a case under the doctrine of unclean hands? 5. Though the law in the United States stipulates . that the clock on Laches is to start once a patent has — ii been granted and published by the USPTO, is it not within the principles of Laches and potentially Equitable Estoppel to start the clock when complainants and their attorneys are confirmed to have had and read the patent application in question? 6. Can there be co-inventors added when the claimed contribution is not in any claim of a patent? iii IL