Whether the United States District Court and Court of Appeals violated constitutional rights through administrative rulemaking and potential breach of constitutional protections

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED “It is emphatically the province and duty of the judicial department to say what the law is, The United States Supreme Court uses its own understanding of the Constitution in reviewing the legitimacy of acts by other branches of the government.” See Marbury v Madison. 5 US 137 (1 Cranch) (1803), Chevron v. Natural Resources Defense Council Supreme Court overturned Chevron and Relentless, Inc v. Department of Commerce 22-1219, setting new limits on the executive branch’s regulatory authority. ; Did The United States District Court For The District Of Columbia and United States Court Of Appeals For The District Of Columbia violate my rights protected by United States Constitution Article I, Section 10, Clause 1 of the United States . Constitution 1, Article I, Section 9, Clause 3 of the Constitution, Article VI of the Constitution, First Amendment, Fifth Amendment, Seventh Amendment, Fourteenth Amendment Section 1, Article III of the U.S. Constitution, Section 2. Text of Section 2 Kentucky Constitution and Maryland Constitution : Declaration Of Rights Article 8, 17 and19 and committed maladministration against the rights of we the people which is a violation of Virginia Bill of Rights 1864 Section 3? , II Also, did The United States District Court For The District Of Columbia and The United States Court Of Appeals For The District Of Columbia error (See The Supreme Court’s June 28 ruling to overturn the Chevron doctrine) which was shown in two cases challenging the 1984 decision: Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo, Relentless, Inc v. Department of Commerce and SEC v. Jarkesy Docket Number: 22-859 Date Argued: 11/29/23) ruling under an cooperative agreement (TITLE 21, ADMINSTRATIVE PROCEDURES ACT, FDA, EPA and CDC) allowing an executive and legislative branch program (TITLE 21-FOOD AND DRUGS CHAPTER I-FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES SUBCHAPTER A—GENERAL PART 56 -PROTECTION OF HUMAN SUBJECTS, Subpart B--Informed Consent of Human Subjects Sec. 50.20 General requirements for informed consent) to the bases of its ruling? Also, isn’t the said breach an act of war? Honorable Court has already ruled that one need not pick This up arms in order to “levy Til war’ in US v Burr (1807) 4 Cranch (8 US) 4669, 2 L.Ed. 684. : Also, isn’t my rights secured by the Constitution . and therefore, there can be no rulemaking or legislation which would abrogate them? See Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 (1966) Also, isn’t absolute and arbitrary power over the lives, liberty and property of freemen exists nowhere in a republic, not even in the largest majority Kentucky Constitution Bill of Rights: Text of Section 2? To claim otherwise doesn’t that give aid and comfort to , enemies (EPA, FDA, APA AND CDC) of the , Constitution? Also, if fraud vitiates everything that it touches, and if giving aid and comfort to enemies of the Constitution is also an act of fraud and maladministration, then when Legislative and Executive branch of government pass a law (TITLE 21--FOOD AND DRUGS CHAPTER I-FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES ; SUBCHAPTER A—GENERAL PART 50 -PROTECTION OF HUMAN SUBJECTS, Subpart B--Informed Consent of Human Subjects Sec. 50.20 General requirements for informed consent) and respondent used it IV against we the people, then what Legislative and Executive branch of government participated constitutes a act of war, long standing abuse, breach of peace, breach of trust and maladministration against the rights of we the people? Also, because my rights protected by 1867 Maryland Constitution, Virginia (50 plus States ; Constitutions Bill and Declaration Of Rights) and United States Constitution its Bills Of Rights, and because Kenneth Chloe has the right, and duty under an implied oath, that we the people are the “trust protectors” of the trust called the United States Constitution against our enemies (unconstitutional governmental agency’s) of the Consti