Does the 9th circuit have power to ignore U.S. Supreme Court ruling in, Felder v. Casey, 487 U.S. 131 (1988)

QUESTION PRESENTED 1 Does the 9th circuit have power to ignore U.S. Supreme Court ruling in, Felder v. Casey, 487 U.S. 131 (1988). The 9th circuit used their own ruling that conflicts with the above Supreme Court ruling. Their ruling: Padgett v Wright, 587 F.3r 983, 985 n.2 (9th Cir. 2009). The 9th circuit threw the whole case out because of the California Tort Claims act, as stated above, conflicts with this court's decision. They stated that the Petitioner had to go to the state that is doing the damage first. They ignored the fact that the County of Los Angeles trespassed with guns using a NAT "SWAT" team to run Petitioner off his own land and interrupted his religious worship in violation of the Federal Religious Act RLUIPA. 42 USC §§ 2000cc, et seq. The county was required to have this in their zoning code, but a Public Records request showed they did not. Petitioner's rights were violated in many ways besides what is mentioned, but all ignored because of the California Tort Claims Act. This court has overruled the 9th circuit as stated above for 1983 claims with the above stated decision. The opinion of the United States District Court and United States 9th Circuit Court of Appeal must be appended. The 9th circuit is in direct opposition to this court's ruling on a technicality. 1 The petitioner requests that this court vacate the lowers court's decision that is in opposition to this court's decision. Also, this court will remand the case all the way back to the district court so Petitioner will be able to have a day in court. PARTIES MARCELO HERNANDEZ Petitioner, VS. HASSAN ALAMEDDINE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES CALIFORNIA MARY C. WICKHAM ROBERT C. CARTWRIGHT ROSA LINDA CRUZ Respondents. RULE 29.6 DISCLOSURE The petitioner is not aware of any disclosures. RELATED CASES There are no related cases. il