Will the Supreme Court allow alleged unconstitutional actions by federal and state officials that potentially violate constitutional rights and election laws?

QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Article II of the Constitution of the United States requires the Defendant and all Federal and State Officers sworn under Oath or Affirmation to, “.. preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States...”. Whereas the provisions of _ Article II require The President of the United States to, “preserve, protect, and defend the Constitution of the United States...” as his primary duty to the Citizens of the United States. Will this Court allow Joseph Robinette Biden Jr., President of the United States, to continue to wrongfully utilize his Office of Public Trust to prioritize the advancement of personal and party politics’ goals and objectives by allowing the illegal editing and altering of the Constitution of the United States over his Sworn (or Affirmed) Primary | Duties of, “... preserving, protecting, and defending the Constitution of the United States ...”? 2. Whether the District Court and the Ninth Circuit Court Violated their respective Constitutional Oaths or Affirmations by discharging the original Case before the Court brought by the Petitioner, Mr. David John Thistle, under the Color of Law18 U.S. Code § 242 depravation of Rights (also found and protected under the “Substantive Due Process Clause”) by States’ Rights Violations and 33 U.S. Code Ch. 7 due to a technicality and not the merits of the evidence of the case. Will this Court now review the Election | Corruption Evidence presented and allow for this case | to be reviewed under the color of law 18 U.S. Code § 242 and possibly 33 U.S. Code Ch7.? 3. Will this Court allow additional Case Laws that may apply to this Case such as 42 U.S. Code § 1983 li Civil Action for Depravation of Rights, 42 U.S. Code § 1985, and the XIV Amendment § 4 “Insurrection / Revolution Clause” to be introduced and added for appropriate context? 4. Whenever a specific cohort of Citizens is targeted by illegal editing of Article I by multiple States without immediate public corrective actions when notified, 42 U.S. Code § 241 Conspiracy Against Rights applies. Will this Court allow the States’ and Federal Officers to continue in Conspiracy Against the Constitutionally protected rights of the citizens? ; 5. Whereas the Attorney General of the United States Merrick Brian Garland is under sworn Oath or . Affirmation to, “... preserve, protect, and defend the Constitution of the United States ...” Will this Court allow Merrick Brian Garland the United States Attorney General to continue to wrongly utilize his Office of Public Trust to prioritize the advancement of Personal and Party Politics’ goals and objectives over his Sworn (or Affirmed) Primary Duties of Preserving, Protecting and Defending the Constitution? 6. Moreover, some States unabashedly chose to knowingly create and enforce States’ Elections Laws that are in direct conflict with the Constitution of the United States’ Article I and Article II. (Example New Hampshire Constitution Art. 11, California Election Law Code 2000.) These are clear States’ Rights Violation of Article I, Article II, Article V, Article VI, and Amendment X, XIV within the Constitution of the United States. Without the due process in accordance with Article V, to control Elections is considered by most Citizens Domestic Terrorism. A note: Domestic Terrorist activities by a sworn (or affirmed) Officer or Officers of the States or Federal Government by most iii Citizens and nearly every Military Veteran, is considered Treason. This aforementioned criminal activity by sworn (or affirmed) Elected and Appointed Officers of the States and Federal Government may Justify a Revolutionary War or Insurrection and the dissolvement of the Union of the United States. Will the United States Supreme Court allow the blatant and disrespectful unauthorized editing or altering of any Article or Amendment within The Constitution of the United States by pen or action by any individual or grouping of individuals no matter their station thereby