Whether the Fifth Circuit violated the fundamental principle of appellate review by affirming a trial court's ruling without evidentiary support for agency authority to bind a corporate entity

QUESTION PRESENTED Whether the Fifth Circuit violated the fundamental principle of appellate review that a finding of fact is clearly erroneous if there is no evidentiary support for it in the record by affirming the trial court’s reimbursement and indemnification rulings even though there was no evidence that Franco Marine 1, L.L.C., Franco Marine 2, L.L.C. and Harley Franco had actual agency authority to bind Harley Marine Services, Inc. to the obligations in the subject vessel construction contracts with Conrad Shipyard, L.L.C.?