Hugh H. Baldwin, Jr. v. Maryland
DueProcess HabeasCorpus JusticiabilityDoctri
Did the State commit a Bad Faith Due Process Violation resulting in outstanding legal consequences to the petitioner, to wit: Significant Collateral Consequences not previously recognized by the Court?
QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Did the State commit a Bad Faith Due Process Violation resulting in outstanding legal consequences to the petitioner, to wit: Significant Collateral Consequences not previously recognized by the Court? 2. Did the State's failure to provide discovery result in outstanding legal consequences to the petitioner, to wit: Significant Collateral Consequences not previously recognized by the Court? 3. Was legal counsel to _ petitioner, Public Defender, Mr. Robert V. Jones and Appellate : Counsel, Public Defenders, Mr. John ~L. Kopolow, and Mr. Alan H. Murrell ineffective? 4. Did the inability to obtain transcripts of all : court hearings, deprive petitioner of the earliest opportunity to pursue post-conviction relief, (while incarcerated, on parole, or on probation) thereby resulting in outstanding legal consequences to the petitioner, to wit: . Significant Collateral Consequences, not previously recognized by the Court? i \ . . STATEMENT OF