No. 24-26

Hugh H. Baldwin, Jr. v. Maryland

Lower Court: Maryland
Docketed: 2024-07-10
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Response Waived
Tags: bad-faith collateral-consequences due-process due-process,collateral-consequences,bad-faith,lega ineffective-assistance legal-counsel post-conviction-relief
Key Terms:
DueProcess HabeasCorpus JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference: 2024-09-30
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Did the State commit a Bad Faith Due Process Violation resulting in outstanding legal consequences to the petitioner, to wit: Significant Collateral Consequences not previously recognized by the Court?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Did the State commit a Bad Faith Due Process Violation resulting in outstanding legal consequences to the petitioner, to wit: Significant Collateral Consequences not previously recognized by the Court? 2. Did the State's failure to provide discovery result in outstanding legal consequences to the petitioner, to wit: Significant Collateral Consequences not previously recognized by the Court? 3. Was legal counsel to _ petitioner, Public Defender, Mr. Robert V. Jones and Appellate : Counsel, Public Defenders, Mr. John ~L. Kopolow, and Mr. Alan H. Murrell ineffective? 4. Did the inability to obtain transcripts of all : court hearings, deprive petitioner of the earliest opportunity to pursue post-conviction relief, (while incarcerated, on parole, or on probation) thereby resulting in outstanding legal consequences to the petitioner, to wit: . Significant Collateral Consequences, not previously recognized by the Court? i \ . . STATEMENT OF

Docket Entries

2024-10-07
Petition DENIED.
2024-07-24
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/30/2024.
2024-07-17
Waiver of Maryland of right to respond submitted.
2024-07-17
Waiver of right of respondent Maryland to respond filed.
2024-07-08

Attorneys

Hugh H. Baldwin, Jr.
Hugh H. Baldwin Jr. — Petitioner
Maryland
Jeremy Hugh WelterMaryland Office of the Attorney General, Respondent