No. 24-260
Anthony Pandrella v. United States
Response Waived
Key Terms:
Privacy
Privacy
Latest Conference:
2024-10-11
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether a robbery of a former loanshark victim can establish federal jurisdiction under the Hobbs Act when the victim had previously withdrawn from the loansharking business
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED Whether the robbery of a loanshark could have an effect on interstate commerce sufficient to establish federal jurisdiction under the Hobbs Act (18 U.S.C. § 1951) even where the victim had withdrawn from the loansharking business prior to the robbery?
Docket Entries
2024-10-15
Petition DENIED.
2024-09-25
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/11/2024.
2024-09-17
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2024-09-05
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due October 9, 2024)
2024-06-18
Application (23A1122) granted by Justice Sotomayor extending the time to file until September 5, 2024.
2024-06-13
Application (23A1122) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from July 7, 2024 to September 5, 2024, submitted to Justice Sotomayor.
Attorneys
Anthony Pandrella
Marshall Aron Mintz — Mintz Law PLLC, Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent