Whether constitutional exceptions should exist to judicial immunities in discrimination claims against judges

QUESTION PRESENTED The Petitioner filed a federal discrimination lawsuit against the Respondent judge claiming that the Respondent judge fraudulently ruled on irrelevant and fabricated matters to terminate the Petitioner's parental rights without making a finding of parental unfitness. And did so out of racial and religious animus, and for the sole purpose of converting the children to Christianity. The suit was dismissed on the doctrines of Judicial Immunity, Rooker-Feldman, and the Eleventh Amendment Immunity. The question presented is: Whether there should be constitutional exceptions to the immunities that shield judges from discrimination claims in the administration of justice.